Criminal Law · MBE-tested

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Vincent Bullock, Appellant

267 A.D.2d 175700 N.Y.S.2d 675·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1999·NY

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Vincent Bullock, Appellant. [700 NYS2d 675] [MAJORITY] —Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Carol Berkman, J.), rendered February 21, 1995, convicting defendant, upon his pleas of guilty, of three counts of robbery in the first degree, and sentencing him, as a second violent felony offender, to three concurrent terms of 7 to 14 years, unanimously affirmed. Defendant’s ineffective assistance claim is based on factual assertions dehors the record and thus would require a motion pursuant to CPL 440.10. To the extent defendant’s claim can be reviewed on the instant record, we find that defendant received meaningful representation (see, People v Ford, 86 NY2d 397, 404). We perceive no abuse of sentencing discretion. Concur — Tom, J. P., Wallach, Lerner, Saxe and Buckley, JJ.