Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
John Kerins, as Administrator, etc., Respondent, v. The Lane Shore and Michigan Southern Railway Company, Appellant, 1888 — 110 N.Y. 677 · caselaw · US
General
John Kerins, as Administrator, etc., Respondent, v. The Lane Shore and Michigan Southern Railway Company, Appellant
110 N.Y. 677·New York Court of Appeals·1888·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
John Kerins, as Administrator, etc., Respondent, v. The Lane Shore and Michigan Southern Railway Company, Appellant.
(Argued October 10, 1888;
decided October 26, 1888.)
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Superior Com’t of Buffalo, in favor of plaintiff, entered upon an order made March 22, 1886, which denied a motion for a new trial, and directed judgment on a verdict.
James F. Gluck for appellant.
Warren F. Miller for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm; no opinion.
All concur, except Andrews, J., not sitting.
Judgment affirmed.