Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
In the Matter of the Estate of Henry Waterman, Deceased. Julia Kenyon, Appellant; Samuel H. Coombs et al., as Executors of Henry Waterman, Deceased, Respondents, 1906 — 186 N.Y. 534 · caselaw · US
General
In the Matter of the Estate of Henry Waterman, Deceased. Julia Kenyon, Appellant; Samuel H. Coombs et al., as Executors of Henry Waterman, Deceased, Respondents
186 N.Y. 534·New York Court of Appeals·1906·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of the Estate of Henry Waterman, Deceased. Julia Kenyon, Appellant; Samuel H. Coombs et al., as Executors of Henry Waterman, Deceased, Respondents.
Matter of Waterman, 112 App. Div. 313, appeal dismissed.
(Argued October 2, 1906;
decided October 16, 1906.)
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered April 27, 1900, which reversed a decree of the Kings County Surrogate’s Court removing two of the executors of the will of Henry Waterman, deceased.
Thadd&us D. Kenneson, Ralph W. Kenyon and Charles II. Kelly for appellant.
Robert E. Wilson for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Appeal dismissed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur; Cullen, Ch. J., Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Vann, WeRner, Willard Bartlett and Chase, JJ.