Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Myndert W. Starin et al., Respondents, v. The Syracuse, Binghamton and New York Railroad Company, Appellant, 1871 — 46 N.Y. 692 · caselaw · US
General
Myndert W. Starin et al., Respondents, v. The Syracuse, Binghamton and New York Railroad Company, Appellant
46 N.Y. 692·New York Court of Appeals·1871·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Myndert W. Starin et al., Respondents, v. The Syracuse, Binghamton and New York Railroad Company, Appellant.
(Argued November 23, 1871;
decided December 5, 1871.)
Decided upon the same grounds as the case of Sherman Wood v. The A7' 7. G. B. B. Go., which will appear in next volume of Court of Appeals reports.
M. Goodrich, for appellant.
G. A7". Kewned/y, for respondents.
[MAJORITY — Peokham, J.,]
Peokham, J.,
reads opinion for affirmance.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.