General
Heddy v. Fullen
1 Blackf. 51·Supreme Court of Indiana·1819·IN
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Heddy v. Fullen.
in a declaration in trover, the property was described as “a certain black mare of the value of 100 dollars:” Held, that the description was sufficiently particular.
APPEAL from the Jackson Circuit Court. — Trover by Fullen against Heddy. The property was described in the declaration as “a certain black mare of the value of 100 dollars.” Plea, not guilty. Verdict as follows, “We of the jury find for the plaintiff 80 dollars in damages.” Judgment thereon.
The errors assigned were: 1st, That the verdict was defective. 2dly, That the property was insufficiently described.
Moore and Dunbar, for the appellant,
[MAJORITY — Holman, J. Per Curiam,.]
Holman, J.
The first point is decided in Findley v. Buchanan ; and as to the second, we deem the description sufficient to authorize a recovery.
Per Curiam,.
The judgment is affirmed, .with costs.
Ante, p. 12.