Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Davis W. Shuler, Respondent, v. Elizabeth Maxwell et al., Appellants, 1888 — 108 N.Y. 636 · caselaw · US
General
Davis W. Shuler, Respondent, v. Elizabeth Maxwell et al., Appellants
108 N.Y. 636·New York Court of Appeals·1888·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Davis W. Shuler, Respondent, v. Elizabeth Maxwell et al., Appellants.
(Argued January 17, 1888;
decided February 7, 1888.)
Appeal from order of the General Term of the Supreme ■Court in the third judicial department, made November 15, 1881, which affirmed two orders of Special Term, one denying a motion for an order requiring plaintiff to repay to defendant, Elizabeth Maxwell, the amount deposited by her on purchase under foreclosure sale herein; the other, denying a motion to ■set aside the sale.
Edward J. Maxwell for appellants.
M. L. Stover for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to dismiss appeal; no opinion.
All concur.
Appeal dismissed.