Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Octavius O. Cottle et al., as Executors of John J. P. Read, Deceased, Respondents, v. Walter Cary et al., Appellants, Impleaded with Others, 1903 — 173 N.Y. 624 · caselaw · US
General
Octavius O. Cottle et al., as Executors of John J. P. Read, Deceased, Respondents, v. Walter Cary et al., Appellants, Impleaded with Others
173 N.Y. 624·New York Court of Appeals·1903·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Octavius O. Cottle et al., as Executors of John J. P. Read, Deceased, Respondents, v. Walter Cary et al., Appellants, Impleaded with Others.
dottle v. Gary, 73 App. Div. 54, affirmed.
(Argued January 20, 1903;
decided February 10, 1903.)
Appeal from á judgment' of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered May 21, 1902, affirming a judgment in favor o.f plaintiffs entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term.
Percy S. Lansdowne and. Charles L. Feldmam for appellants.
Edmund P. Cottle for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., Bartlett, Haight, Martin, Cullen and Werner, JJ. Absent: Vann, J.