Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Frank H. Baker et al., Appellants, v. George E. Baker et al., Respondents, 1898 — 157 N.Y. 671 · caselaw · US
General
Frank H. Baker et al., Appellants, v. George E. Baker et al., Respondents
157 N.Y. 671·New York Court of Appeals·1898·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Frank H. Baker et al., Appellants, v. George E. Baker et al., Respondents.
Baker v. Baker, 18 App. Div. 189, appeal dismissed.
(Argued October 3, 1898;
decided October 11, 1898.)
Motion to dismiss an appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered June 10, 1897, reversing an interlocutory judgment of partition and sale and dismissing the complaint.
The motion was made upon the grounds that the parties interested have consented to a dismissal, and that a decision of the appeal could have no practical effect.
Charles H. Otis for motion.
Ro one opposed.
[MAJORITY]
Appeal dismissed, without costs.