General
Josephine M. Fairchild, Plaintiff, v. Emma E. Reed De Guzman, Appellant, Impleaded with Scarsdale Estates, Respondent, and White Plains Development Company and Others, Defendants
174 A.D. 888·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1916·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Josephine M. Fairchild, Plaintiff, v. Emma E. Reed De Guzman, Appellant, Impleaded with Scarsdale Estates, Respondent, and White Plains Development Company and Others, Defendants.
[MAJORITY]
Motion denied on condition that the appellant perfect the appeal, place the case on the September calendar and be ready for argument when reached; otherwise, motion granted, with ten dollars costs. Present — Jenks, P. J., Carr, Stapleton, Mills and Rich, JJ.