General
Theodore B. Foulke, Respondent, v. Eugene Thalmessinger, Appellant
158 N.Y. 725·New York Court of Appeals·1899·NY
All concur'.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Theodore B. Foulke, Respondent, v. Eugene Thalmessinger, Appellant.
(Argued March 8, 1899;
decided March 24, 1899.)
Appeal from a judgment and order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered March 7, 1896, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Circuit, without a jury, and an order denying a motion for a new trial.
Foulke v. Thalmessinger, 1 App. Div. 598, affirmed.
Damid Gerber and I. M. Dittenhoefer for appellant.
Charles A. Decker for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
-Judgment and order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
All concur'.