Bankruptcy
In re KALNITZSKY BROS. & OPPENHEIM. Appeal of MARLOW
285 F. 652·United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·1922
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In re KALNITZSKY BROS. & OPPENHEIM. Appeal of MARLOW.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
October 24, 1922.)
No. 31.
Petition to Revise Order of the District Court of the United' States for the Southern District of New York.
In the matter of the estate of Kalnitzsky Bros. & Oppenheim, alleged bankrupts. Prom an order granting the petition of P. U. Stearns & Co. to refer to a special master to hear and report on their claim to goods in the hands of the receivers in bankruptcy (285 Ped. 649), Meyer Marlow appeals.
Affirmed.
Meyer Marlow, of New York City (David K. Shappiro, of New York City, of counsel), for appellant.
W. A. Cunningham, of New York City (White & Case and Ernest G. Pifield, all of New York City, of counsel), for respondent.
Before ROGERS, MANTON, and MAYER, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Order affirmed.