Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Elina Skarderud, Plaintiff in Error, v. Tax Commission of the State of North Dakota, 1917 — 245 U.S. 633 · caselaw · US
Tax
Elina Skarderud, Plaintiff in Error, v. Tax Commission of the State of North Dakota
245 U.S. 633·Supreme Court of the United States·1917
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 507.
Elina Skarderud, Plaintiff in Error, v. Tax Commission of the State of North Dakota.
In error to the Supreme Court of the State of North Dakota.
Submitted November 23, 1917.
Decided December 10, 1917.
Mr. Edward Engerud for plaintiff in error.
Mr. William Langer for defendant in error.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
Judgment affirmed with costs upon the authority of Duus v. Brown, this day decided, ante, 176.