General
Harvey Joyce, Appellant, v. The Rome, Watertown and Ogdensburg Railroad Company, Respondent
168 N.Y. 665·New York Court of Appeals·1901·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Harvey Joyce, Appellant, v. The Rome, Watertown and Ogdensburg Railroad Company, Respondent.
Joyce y. Borne, Watertown & O. B. B. Co., 92 Hun, 107, affirmed.
(Argued October 28, 1901;
decided November 12, 1901.)
Appeal from a judgment of the late General Term of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered January 10,1896, affirming a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon a verdict and an order denying a motion for a new trial.
J. W. Shea for appellant.
Henry Purcell for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., Gray, O’Brien, Haight, Landon, Cullen and'Werner, JJ.