Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
David Boyd, Individually and as Administrator, etc., Respondent, v. Robert Boyd et al., Impleaded, etc., Appellants, 1895 — 146 N.Y. 403 · caselaw · US
General
David Boyd, Individually and as Administrator, etc., Respondent, v. Robert Boyd et al., Impleaded, etc., Appellants
146 N.Y. 403·New York Court of Appeals·1895·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
David Boyd, Individually and as Administrator, etc., Respondent, v. Robert Boyd et al., Impleaded, etc., Appellants.
(Argued June 3, 1895;
decided June 14, 1895.)
Appeal from order of the General Term of the Court of Common Pleas for the city and county of New York, made the first Monday of April, 1895, which affirmed an order of Special Term denying a motion by defendants to strike the above-entitled cause from the calendar, etc.
Henry Daily, Jr., for appellants.
Edward W. 8. Johnston for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm; no opinion.
All concur.
Order affirmed.