Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Cornelia T. Terry, Respondent, v. Katharine T. Moore, Impleaded, etc., Appellant, 1896 — 149 N.Y. 613 · caselaw · US
General
Cornelia T. Terry, Respondent, v. Katharine T. Moore, Impleaded, etc., Appellant
149 N.Y. 613·New York Court of Appeals·1896·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Cornelia T. Terry, Respondent, v. Katharine T. Moore, Impleaded, etc., Appellant.
(Submitted June 8, 1896;
decided June 16, 1896.)
Motion to amend remittitur.
(See, ante, p. 594.)
Charles Edward Souther for motion.
Flamen B. Candler and John M. Buckingham opposed.
[MAJORITY]
Motion granted so far as to amend remittitur so as to allow defendant to apply to Special Term of Supreme Court for leave to withdraw her demurrer and interpose an answer.