Skip to main content

Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.

Lace et al. v. United States; Ogrod et al. v. School District of Philadelphia; Superior Oil Co. v. City of Port Arthur, Texas, et al.; Mazaleski v. May; Valerino v. Valerino; Theoharous v. Deer Run Shores Property Owners Assn., Inc.; Martin v. United States; Smith v. Georgia; Hudak v. Curators of the University of Missouri et al.; Johnson v. Tennessee; Brooks v. Zant, Warden, Georgia Diagnostic and Classification Center; Breedlove v. Florida; Wendt v. MacDougall; Wayland v. Registry of Deeds, Salem, et al.; Buchanan v. Jefferson County et al.; Penick v. Virginia; Dickerson v. Johnson, Administrator, Veterans Administration, et al.; Johl v. Town of Groton et al., In re Sims, Sellars v. City of Los Angeles, California, et al.; Dixon v. MacDougall, 1982 — 459 U.S. 1060 · caselaw · US