General
KILPATRICK et al. v. SEVERAIN
125 F. 1003·United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·1903
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
KILPATRICK et al. v. SEVERAIN.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
October 12, 1903.)
No. 1,981.
[MAJORITY]
In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Nebraska. T. J. Mahoney, N. K. Griggs, Alfred Hazlett, and Fulton Jack, for plaintiffs in error. Smyth & Smith, for defendant in error. No opinion. Reversed, at costs of plaintiffs in error, per stipulation of parties, and remanded to the Circuit Court, with directions to dismiss the case on the merits, with prejudice to any further action thereon.