General
GARFIELD v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA EX REL. VAUGHAN
31 App. D.C. 232·Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia·1908·DC
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
GARFIELD v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA EX REL. VAUGHAN. (2)
Garfield v. United States, 30 App. D. C. 177, applied and followed.
No. 1864.
Submitted April 7, 1908.
Decided April 8, 1908.
Hearing oil an appeal by the respondent from an order of the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia directing the issuance of the writ of mandamus to the Secretary of the Interior commanding him to restore the names of the relators to the roll of members or citizenship of the Chickasaw Tribe or Nation
Affirmed.
Mr. Edward T. Sanford, Assistant Attorney General and Mr. William R. Harr, Special Assistant to the Attorney General, for the appellant.
Messrs. Kappler & Merillat for the appellees.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam :]
Per Curiam :
This case is similar in all substantial respects to that of Garfield v. United States, 30 App. D. C. 177, and, for the reasons given in the opinion in that case, must be affirmed with costs.
A writ of error to the Supreme Court of the United States was allowed April 10, 1908.