Securities

Salvatore M. Gerbino et al., Respondents, v. John Stewart, Individually and Doing Business as Pro-Tect Security, Respondent, and Tinseltown USA et al., Appellants

13 A.D.3d 1073786 N.Y.S.2d 780·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·2004·NY

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

Salvatore M. Gerbino et al., Respondents, v John Stewart, Individually and Doing Business as Pro-Tect Security, Respondent, and Tinseltown USA et al., Appellants. (Appeal No. 3.) [786 NYS2d 780] [MAJORITY] Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (William B Polito, J.), entered August 7, 2003 in a personal injury action. The order denied in part the motion of defendants Tinseltown USA and Cinemark USA, Inc. to set aside the verdict. It is hereby ordered that said appeal be and the same hereby is unanimously dismissed without costs (see Smith v Catholic Med. Ctr. of Brooklyn & Queens, 155 AD2d 435 [1989]; see also CPLR 5501 [a] [1], [2]). Present—Pigott, Jr., PJ., Pine, Scudder, Martoche and Lawton, JJ.