General
Tilman FLANIGAN v. STATE
23 Ala. App. 627127 So. 919·Alabama Court of Appeals·1930·AL
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
(127 So. 919)
Tilman FLANIGAN v. STATE.
8 Div. 881.
Court of Appeals of Alabama.
March 4, 1930.
J. G. Rankin, of Athens, for appellant.
Charlie C. McCall, Atty. Gen., for the State.
[MAJORITY — BRIOKEN, P. J.]
BRIOKEN, P. J.
The conflicting evidence adduced upon the trial of this case made a jury question and rendered inapt the affirmative charge requested by appellant. This is the only point of decision presented on this appeal, which is from a judgment of conviction for distilling, making, or manufacturing alcoholic or spirituous liquors. Said judgment is affirmed.
Affirmed.