Contracts · MBE-tested
United Parcel Service, Inc. v. Tinsley et al.
452 U.S. 934·Supreme Court of the United States·1981
Justice Stevens dissents and would deny certiorari.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 80-1550.
United Parcel Service, Inc. v. Tinsley et al.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 7th Cir. Motion of respondent Paul E. Tinsley, Jr., for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and certiorari granted. Judgment vacated and case remanded for further consideration in light of Clayton v. Automobile Workers, 451 U. S. 679 (1981).
Justice Stevens dissents and would deny certiorari.