General
Albert L. Veeder, Respondent, v. Marcus S. Piscitelli (Otherwise Known as Marcus S. P. Tancred), Appellant. (Action No. 1.); Albert L. Veeder, Respondent, v. Marcus S. Piscitelli (Otherwise Known as Marcus S. P. Tancred), Appellant.; Frank Radley and Another, Respondents; The People of the State of New York and Others, Defendants. (Action No. 2.)
225 A.D. 834·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1929·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Albert L. Veeder, Respondent, v. Marcus S. Piscitelli (Otherwise Known as Marcus S. P. Tancred), Appellant. (Action No. 1.) Albert L. Veeder, Respondent, v. Marcus S. Piscitelli (Otherwise Known as Marcus S. P. Tancred), Appellant. Frank Radley and Another, Respondents; The People of the State of New York and Others, Defendants. (Action No. 2.)
[MAJORITY]
In action No. 1 the judgment and order are affirmed, with costs. In action No. 2 the award to Veeder is modified and reduced to $340, with interest from August 8, 1927, and, as so modified, affirmed; the award to Radley is modified and reduced to $25, "with interest from August 8,1927, and, as so modified, affirmed; the award to Chandler, with interest from August 8, 1927, is affirmed. Van Kirk, P. J., Davis, Whitmyer, Hill and Hasbrouck, JJ., concur.