Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
The Charles Carter. Blaine v. The Ship Charles Carter et al., 1800 — 4 U.S. 20 · caselaw · US
Admiralty
The Charles Carter. Blaine v. The Ship Charles Carter et al.
4 U.S. 204 Dall. 20·Supreme Court of the United States·1800
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The Charles Carter. Blaine v. The Ship Charles Carter et al.
Error.
Whatever may be the original nature of the suit in a circuit court, it cannot be removed into the supreme court, except by writ of error.
This was an appeal from the Circuit Court of Virginia; and the preliminary question discussed was, whether such a process could he sustained? After argument—
[MAJORITY]
The Court decided, that the removal of suits, from the circuit court into the supreme court, must be by writ of error, in every case, whatever maybe the original nature of the suits.
An appeal is allowed in eases of equity, admiralty and prize, by act of 8d March 1808 § 2 (2 D. S. Stat. 244); and R. S. § 692. .