Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
In the Matter of the Estate of Ella F. Bunting, Deceased. Gerardine H. Hickok, Appellant; Elizabeth M. Bunting, as Executrix, Respondent, 1905 — 182 N.Y. 552 · caselaw · US
General
In the Matter of the Estate of Ella F. Bunting, Deceased. Gerardine H. Hickok, Appellant; Elizabeth M. Bunting, as Executrix, Respondent
182 N.Y. 552·New York Court of Appeals·1905·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of the Estate of Ella F. Bunting, Deceased. Gerardine H. Hickok, Appellant; Elizabeth M. Bunting, as Executrix, Respondent.
(Argued June 16, 1905;
decided October 17, 1905.)
Matter of Bunting, 98 App. Div. 122, 623, appeal dismissed.
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, made November 11,1904, which affirmed a decree of the New York County-Surrogate’s Court finally settling the accounts of Elizabeth M. Bunting as executrix of Ella F. Bunting, deceased, and dismissing the objections thereto.
Edward L. Blackman and Alfred B. Cruikshank for appellant.
Herbert Parsons for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Appeal dismissed, without costs; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Bartlett, Haight, Yann and Werner, JJ. Absent: Gray and O’Brien, JJ.