Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
George E. Spencer, Appellant, v. Arabella D. Huntington et al., as Executors of Collis P. Huntington, Deceased, Respondents, 1905 — 183 N.Y. 506 · caselaw · US
General
George E. Spencer, Appellant, v. Arabella D. Huntington et al., as Executors of Collis P. Huntington, Deceased, Respondents
183 N.Y. 506·New York Court of Appeals·1905·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
George E. Spencer, Appellant, v. Arabella D. Huntington et al., as Executors of Collis P. Huntington, Deceased, Respondents.
(Argued October 11, 1905;
decided October 27, 1905.)
Spencer v. Huntington, 100 App. Div. 463, affirmed.
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered January 18, 1905, affirming a 'judgment in favor of defendants entered upon the report of a referee.
Herbert Barry, Julien T. Davies, Charles H. Tuttle and Julian C. Harrison for appellant.
Maxwell Evarts for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs, on opinion below.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gbay, Haight and Webneb, JJ. Not voting: Babtlett and Vann, JJ. Absent: O’Bbien, J: