Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
In the Matter of the Judicial Accounting of Albert Payne et al., as Executors of Silas W. Payne, Deceased, Respondents; Sarah R. Ketcham, Appellant, 1897 — 151 N.Y. 654 · caselaw · US
General
In the Matter of the Judicial Accounting of Albert Payne et al., as Executors of Silas W. Payne, Deceased, Respondents; Sarah R. Ketcham, Appellant
151 N.Y. 654·New York Court of Appeals·1897·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of the Judicial Accounting of Albert Payne et al., as Executors of Silas W. Payne, Deceased, Respondents; Sarah R. Ketcham, Appellant.
Matter of Payne, 78 Hun, 292, affirmed
(Submitted December 18, 1896;
decided January 19, 1897.)
Appeal from a judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered May 24, 1894, which modified and, as modified, affirmed a decree of the surrogate of Suffolk county settling the accounts of respondents as executors.
Timothy M. Griffing for appellant.
Walter H. Jaycox for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
All concur.