Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Mathews et al. v. West Virginia ex rel. Hamilton, Prosecuting Attorney, 1943 — 320 U.S. 707 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Mathews et al. v. West Virginia ex rel. Hamilton, Prosecuting Attorney
320 U.S. 707·Supreme Court of the United States·1943
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 155.
Mathews et al. v. West Virginia ex rel. Hamilton, Prosecuting Attorney.
October 18, 1943.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam:]
Per Curiam:
The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. Subsequent to the decision of the Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia, denying leave to appeal on the ground that the decree of the Circuit Court of Calhoun County was “plainly right,” this Court in Taylor v. Mississippi, 319 U. S. 583, Benoit v. Mississippi, 319 U. S. 583, Cummings v. Mississippi, 319 U. S. 583, and West Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette, 319 U. S. 624, considered questions having a bearing on the issues in the present case. Accordingly we vacate the judgment and remand the cause to the Circuit Court of Calhoun County for further consideration in the light of our decisions in those cases. New York ex rel. Whitman v. Wilson, 318 U. S. 688, 690-91, and cases cited.
Mr. Hayden C. Covington for petitioners.