Tax
MITCHELL et al. v. RIDDELL, DISTRICT DIRECTOR OF INTERNAL REVENUE, et al.
394 U.S. 456·Supreme Court of the United States·1969
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
MITCHELL et al. v. RIDDELL, DISTRICT DIRECTOR OF INTERNAL REVENUE, et al.
No. 1044.
Decided April 1, 1969.
Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Walters, and Gilbert E. Andrews for appellees.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The motion to dismiss is granted .and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.