IP
Lanolin Plus Cosmetics, Inc. v. Marzall, Commissioner of Patents, et al.
344 U.S. 655·Supreme Court of the United States·1952
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 118.
Lanolin Plus Cosmetics, Inc. v. Marzall, Commissioner of Patents, et al.
James R. McKnight and Emory L. Groff for petitioner.
Solicitor General Perlman, Assistant Attorney General Baldridge, Paul A. Sweeney and Hubert H. Margolies for the Commissioner of Patents; and Al-fons B. Landa and Raymond C. Cushwa for Botany Mills, Inc., respondents.
[MAJORITY]
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Certiorari denied.