Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Charles Banks, Appellant, v. The New York Club, Respondent, 1894 — 142 N.Y. 673 · caselaw · US
General
Charles Banks, Appellant, v. The New York Club, Respondent
142 N.Y. 673·New York Court of Appeals·1894·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Charles Banks, Appellant, v. The New York Club, Respondent.
(Argued April 24, 1894;
decided June 5, 1894.)
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered upon an order made the first Monday of March, 1893, which overruled plaintiff’s exceptions and directed judgment in favor of defendant upon a verdict directed by the court.
John G. Colemam, for appellant.
Ira I). Warren for respondent.
Reported below, 68 Hun, 92.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm on opinion below.
All concur, except Peokham and Gbay, JJ., not voting.
Judgment affirmed.