Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
MICHIGAN WISCONSIN PIPE LINE CO. v. CORPORATION COMMISSION OF OKLAHOMA et al., 1958 — 355 U.S. 425 · caselaw · US
Corporations
MICHIGAN WISCONSIN PIPE LINE CO. v. CORPORATION COMMISSION OF OKLAHOMA et al.
355 U.S. 425·Supreme Court of the United States·1958
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
MICHIGAN WISCONSIN PIPE LINE CO. v. CORPORATION COMMISSION OF OKLAHOMA et al.
No. 86.
Decided January 27, 1958.
Coleman Hayes and Arthur R. Seder, Jr. for appellant in No. 86.
Rayburn L. Foster, Harry D. Turner, R. M. Williams and Cecil C. Hamilton for appellant in Nos. Ill, 112 and 113. •
Ferrill H. Rogers for the Corporation Commission of Oklahoma, appellee.
Together with Nos. 111, 112 and 113, Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Corporation Commission of Oklahoma et al., also on appeals from the same Court.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The judgments are reversed. Cities Service Gas Co. v. State Corporation Commission of Kansas, 355 U. S. 391.