Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Cornelius Jones, Respondent, v. John P. Anderson, Appellant, 1877 — 71 N.Y. 599 · caselaw · US
General
Cornelius Jones, Respondent, v. John P. Anderson, Appellant
71 N.Y. 599·New York Court of Appeals·1877·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Cornelius Jones, Respondent, v. John P. Anderson, Appellant.
When an appeal to this court has been dismissed for failure to serve papers, and the remittitur has been sent down, judgment entered thereon and execution issued, a motion will not be entertained to reinstate the appeal.
It seems that in such case the appellant should move in the Supreme Court to have the proceedings there vacated, and the remittitur returned here, to the end that he may then make his motion for relief.
(Argued November 13, 1877 ;
decided November 20,1877.)
This was a motion to reinstate an appeal which had been regularly dismissed under the rule, for failure to serve printed case. Held, as above.
J. P. Sanders, for motion.
W. W. Niles, opposed.
[MAJORITY — Earl, J.,]
Earl, J.,
reads mem. for denial of motion.
All concur.
Motion denied.