General
GOLD et al. v. DiCARLO, COMMISSIONER OF LICENSES OF CITY OF NEW YORK, et al.
380 U.S. 520·Supreme Court of the United States·1965
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
GOLD et al. v. DiCARLO, COMMISSIONER OF LICENSES OF CITY OF NEW YORK, et al.
No. 901.
Decided April 26, 1965.
Jesse Moss for appellants.
Leo A. Larkin and Seymour B. Quel for DiCarlo, and Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General of New York, pro se, Samuel A. Hirshowitz, First Assistant Attorney General, and Lester Esterman, Assistant Attorney General, for Lefkowitz, appellees.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.