Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM WORKERS OF AMERICA, INC. v. AMERICAN OIL CO., 1964 — 379 U.S. 130 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM WORKERS OF AMERICA, INC. v. AMERICAN OIL CO.
379 U.S. 13013 L. Ed. 2d 333·Supreme Court of the United States·1964
Mr. Justice Goldberg took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM WORKERS OF AMERICA, INC. v. AMERICAN OIL CO.
No. 55.
Argued November 9, 1964.
Decided November 23, 1964.
David E. Feller argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs were William Belshaw, Benedict R. Danko, Elliot Bredhoff, Jerry D. Anker and Michael H. Gottesman.
Frederic D. Anderson argued the cause for respondent. With him -on the brief were Richard P. Tinkham and Daniel F. Kelly.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court.
Mr. Justice Goldberg took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.