Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Chandler, U. S. District Judge v. O'Bryan, 1971 — 404 U.S. 980 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Chandler, U. S. District Judge v. O'Bryan
404 U.S. 980·Supreme Court of the United States·1971
Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this application.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
December 3, 1971
No. A-577.
Chandler, U. S. District Judge v. O'Bryan.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 10th Cir. Application for extension of time to file petition for writ of certiorari and stay of mandate presented to Mr. Justice White, and by him referred to the Court, granted. It is ordered that the time for filing petition for writ of certiorari be extended, and the mandate be stayed until January 7, 1972. If petition for writ of certiorari be filed on or before January 7, 1972, then mandate is further stayed pending disposition of petition for writ of certiorari.
Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this application.