Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Department of Employment et al. v. United States et al., 1966 — 384 U.S. 949 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Department of Employment et al. v. United States et al.
384 U.S. 949·Supreme Court of the United States·1966
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 1071.
Department of Employment et al. v. United States et al.
Duke W. Dunbar, Attorney General of Colorado, Frank E. Hickey, Deputy Attorney General, James D. McKevitt, Assistant Attorney General, for appellants. Solicitor General Marshall, Acting Assistant Attorney General Roberts, I. Henry Kutz and William Massar for the United States et al.
[MAJORITY]
Appeal from D. C. Colo. Further consideration of the question of jurisdiction postponed to the hearing of the case on the merits.