Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
In the Matter of the Application of the City of New York, Appellant, for a Writ of Certiorari against Elbert Sloat et al., as Assessors of the Town of Carmel, Respondents, 1905 — 183 N.Y. 541 · caselaw · US
Corporations
In the Matter of the Application of the City of New York, Appellant, for a Writ of Certiorari against Elbert Sloat et al., as Assessors of the Town of Carmel, Respondents
183 N.Y. 541·New York Court of Appeals·1905·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of the Application of the City of New York, Appellant, for a Writ of Certiorari against Elbert Sloat et al., as Assessors of the Town of Carmel, Respondents.
(Argued November 21, 1905;
decided December 5, 1905.)
Matter of City of New York, 106 App. Div. 614, affirmed.
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered June 29, 1905, which affirmed an order of Special íerni confirming the proceedings of the respondents herein in assessing property of the petitioner for the purpose of taxation and dismissed a writ of certiorari to review such proceedings.
John J. Delany, Corporation Counsel (I. J. Beaudrias of counsel), for appellant.
Clayton Ryder and George E. Anderson for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed, with costs, on opinion in Matter of City of Mew Yorlü v. Mitchell (183 H. Y. 245).
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, O’Brien, Bartlett, Haight, Vann and Werner, JJ.