Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
John G. Hassard, Appellant, v. United States of Mexico et al., Respondents, 1903 — 173 N.Y. 645 · caselaw · US
General
John G. Hassard, Appellant, v. United States of Mexico et al., Respondents
173 N.Y. 645·New York Court of Appeals·1903·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
John G. Hassard, Appellant, v. United States of Mexico et al., Respondents.
Hassard v. United States of Mexico, 46 App. Div. 623, affirmed.
(Submitted February 9, 1903;
decided February 24, 1903.)
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered December 26, 1899, which affirmed an order of Special Term- dismissing the complaint and vacating a warrant of attachment.
Franklin Bien for appellant.
Ernest E. Baldwin and Henry L. Burnett for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., Gray, O’Brien, Haight, Martin, Vann and Werner, JJ.