Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Georgia Railroad & Banking Co. v. Redwine, State Revenue Commissioner, 1950 — 339 U.S. 901 · caselaw · US
General
Georgia Railroad & Banking Co. v. Redwine, State Revenue Commissioner
339 U.S. 901·Supreme Court of the United States·1950
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 454.
Georgia Railroad & Banking Co. v. Redwine, State Revenue Commissioner.
Argued February 13, 1950.
Order entered February 20, 1950.
Furman Smith argued the cause for appellant.
With him on the brief was Robert B. Trout-man. M. H. Blackshear, Jr., Assistant Attorney General of Georgia, argued the cause for appellee.
With him on the brief were Eugene Cook, Attorney General, and Edward E. Dorsey.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam:]
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia.
Per Curiam:
Inasmuch as the Attorney General of Georgia stated at the bar of this Court that plain, speedy, and efficient state remedies were available to appellant, the cause is ordered continued for such period as will enable appellant with all convenient speed to assert such remedies.
Victor Davidson and Standish Thompson filed a brief for certain counties and municipalities of Georgia, as amici curiae, urging affirmance.