Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes et al. v. United States et al., 1961 — 365 U.S. 809 · caselaw · US
Civil Procedure · MBE-tested
Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes et al. v. United States et al.
365 U.S. 809·Supreme Court of the United States·1961
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 681.
Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes et al. v. United States et al.
Clarence M. Mulholland, Edward J. Hickey, Jr., James L. Highsaw, Jr., William G. Ma-honey, George E. Brand and George E. Brand, Jr. for appellants.
Solicitor General Rankin, Solicitor General Cox and Robert W. Ginnane for the United States et al.
Ralph L. McAfee, John H. Pickering and Richard D. Rohr for the Erie-Lackawanna Railroad Co., appellee.
[MAJORITY]
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan. Probable jurisdiction noted and motions to advance granted. The application for a stay of the decree of the three-judge district court insofar as it terminated a temporary restraining order previously granted presented to Mr. Justice Stewart, and by him referred to the Court, is granted.