Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Hines et al. v. Anchor Motor Freight, Inc., et al., 1975 — 423 U.S. 816 · caselaw · US
General
Hines et al. v. Anchor Motor Freight, Inc., et al.
423 U.S. 816·Supreme Court of the United States·1975
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 74-1025.
Hines et al. v. Anchor Motor Freight, Inc., et al.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 6th Cir. [Certiorari granted, 421 U. S. 928.] Motion to substitute Charles A. Hines as a party petitioner in place of Burtice A. Hines, deceased, granted. Motion of Prod, Inc., et al., for leave to file a brief as amici curiae granted. Motion of American Federation of Labor & Congress of Industrial Organizations for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae denied.