Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Louis Bills, Respondent, v. The New York Central Railroad Company, Appellant, 1873 — 53 N.Y. 608 · caselaw · US
Torts · MBE-tested
Louis Bills, Respondent, v. The New York Central Railroad Company, Appellant
53 N.Y. 608·New York Court of Appeals·1873·NY
All concur, except Andbews, J., not voting.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Louis Bills, Respondent, v. The New York Central Railroad Company, Appellant.
(Argued May 13, 1873;
decided May 21, 1873.)
This was an action to recover damages for alleged negligence, on the part of defendant, in the transportation of stock.
The case presented substantially the same question, and was decided upon authority of Perm v. B. & E. B. B. Co., 49 N. Y., 204.
Samuel Hand for the appellant.
N. C. Moak for the respondent.
[MAJORITY — Rapallo, J.,]
Rapallo, J.,
reads for reversal and new trial.
All concur, except Andbews, J., not voting.
Judgment affirmed.