General
VESEY v. SEAWALL et al.; CRAWFORD et al. v. SAME
65 F. 398·United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·1894
Before TAFT and LURTON, Circuit Judges, and BARK, District Judge.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
VESEY v. SEAWALL et al. CRAWFORD et al. v. SAME.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
May 14, 1894.)
Nos. 151 and 152.
In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern Division of the Southern District of Ohio.
Mills Gardner and Humphrey Jones, for plaintiffs in error.
Matthews & Cleveland, for defendants in error.
Before TAFT and LURTON, Circuit Judges, and BARK, District Judge.
[MAJORITY — TAFT, Circuit Judge.]
TAFT, Circuit Judge.
In these cases the same question precisely is presented which was decided in the preceding case of Klever v. Seawall, 65 Fed. 373. The same result, therefore, is reached, and the same orders will be made.