Corporations

Arthur W. Smith et al., Respondents, v. London Assurance Corporation, Appellant

186 N.Y. 541·New York Court of Appeals·1906·NY

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

Arthur W. Smith et al., Respondents, v. London Assurance Corporation, Appellant. Smithy. London Assur. Corpn., 114 App. Div. 868, appeal dismissed. (Submitted October 8, 1906; decided October 16, 1906.) Motion to dismiss an appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered July 24, 1906, which reversed an order of Special Term granting a motion for a compulsory order of reference. The motion was made upon the grounds that the papers served were defective and that permission to appeal had not been obtained. McFarland, Taylor d> Costello for motion. Willard PcurTter Butler opposed. [MAJORITY] Motion granted and appeal dismissed, with costs.