Civil Procedure · MBE-tested

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Ricardo Mc Cray, Appellant

227 A.D.2d 916643 N.Y.S.2d 792·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1996·NY

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Ricardo Mc Cray, Appellant. [643 NYS2d 792] [MAJORITY] Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Supreme Court did not err in denying defendant’s suppression motion without conducting a hearing (see, CPL 710.60 [3]). There is no dispute that the revolver sought to be suppressed was not seized from defendant’s person. Moreover, defendant neither alleged nor demonstrated that he had an expectation of privacy in the area where the revolver was seized. Thus, defendant lacks standing to challenge the seizure of the revolver (see, People v Brown, 182 AD2d 451, 452, lv denied 80 NY2d 828). Upon our review of the record, we are not persuaded that the sentence is either unduly harsh or severe. (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Michalek, J. — Criminal Possession Weapon, 3rd Degree.) Present — Green, J. P., Fallon, Wesley, Davis and Boehm, JJ.