General
Key Bank of Southeastern New York, N. A., Respondent, v. Sidney Pal et al., as Trustees of the Tamara Trust, et al., Appellants
110 A.D.2d 686·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1985·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Key Bank of Southeastern New York, N. A., Respondent, v Sidney Pal et al., as Trustees of the Tamara Trust, et al., Appellants.
[MAJORITY]
Special Term properly granted plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment in the sum of $166,152.03. It is uncontested that defendants owed plaintiff that sum. Furthermore, the asserted defenses of novation, accord and satisfaction, and equitable estoppel are without merit (see, Fuller v Kemp, 138 NY 231; Donemore Clothing Co. v Shapiro, 202 NYS 258; Cantasano v Courtney, 98 Misc 623; McLaughlin v Gillings, 18 Misc 56). Titone, J. P., Bracken, Rubin and Lawrence, JJ., concur.