General
Fred Christansen and Another, etc., Respondents; Borghil Christansen, Plaintiff, v. United Auto Delivery, Inc., Appellant
248 A.D. 750·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1936·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Fred Christansen and Another, etc., Respondents; Borghil Christansen, Plaintiff, v. United Auto Delivery, Inc., Appellant.
[MAJORITY]
Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied. Stay continued until the granting or final refusal by the Court of Appeals of leave to appeal. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Davis and Johnston, JJ.