IP
In re SCHWEINERT et al.
269 F. 1020·United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit·1921
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In re SCHWEINERT et al.
(Court of Appeals of District of Columbia.
Submitted November 8, 1920.
Decided January 3, 1921.)
No. 1323.
Appeal from the Commissioner of Patents. In the matter of the application of Maximilian Charles Sehweinert and another for the patent of a tire valve. From a decision of the Commissioner of Patents, refusing to grant the patent, applicants appeal.
Affirmed.
E. V. Myers and G. R. Thompson, both of New York City, and Milans & Milans, of Washington, D. C., for appellants.
T. A. Hostetler, of Washington, D. O., for Commissioner of Patents.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Appeal from the refusal of the Commissioner of Patents to grant a patent for a tire valve. We agree with the Commissioner that the applicant has made no patentable advance over the prior art. The decision is affirmed. Affirmed.