General
Euphemia Larbig, Respondent, v. Edwin H. Peck et al., Appellants
174 N.Y. 513·New York Court of Appeals·1903·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Euphemia Larbig, Respondent, v. Edwin H. Peck et al., Appellants.
Larbig v.. Peck, 69 App. Div. 170, affirmed.
(Argued February 23, 1903;
decided March 17, 1903.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department,- entered February 24, 1902, affirming a judgment iñ favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict and an order denying a motion for a new trial.
Charles F. Brown- and George 8. Hamlin for appellants.
Louis Marshall and James W. Hyde for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs ; no opinion.
Concur: Parker, Oh. J., O’Brien, Bartlett. Martin, Vann, Cullen and Werner, JJ.