Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
BUCK et al. v. LESTER et al., 1928 — 24 F.2d 877 · caselaw · US
Corporations
BUCK et al. v. LESTER et al.
24 F.2d 877·United States District Court for the Eastern District of South Carolina·1928
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
BUCK et al. v. LESTER et al.
District Court, E. D. South Carolina.
March 7, 1928.
Copyrights <®=>75 — -Defense in suit for infringement of copyright in musical composition that no notice of copyright appeared on piano roll, held insufficient.
In suit for infringement of copyright in musical composition played on a player piano from a perforated roll for enjoyment of patrons of a picture theater, defense that no notice of copyright appeared on perforated roll which was being used held insufficient.
In Equity. Suit by Gene Buck as president of the American Society of Composers, Authors and Publishers and another against Mrs. Sue Lester and another.
Decree for plaintiffs.
J. N. Nathans, of Charleston, S. C., and Wm. E. Arnaud, of Atlanta, Ga., for plaintiffs.
E. A. Blackwell, of Columbia, S. C., for defendants.
[MAJORITY — ERNEST F. COCHRAN, District Judge.]
ERNEST F. COCHRAN, District Judge.
This matter came up before me on hearing on infringement of copyright. The facts as admitted are as follows:
The plaintiff, Leo Feist, Ine., is the owner of the copyright, and the American Society of Composers, Authors and Publishers, represented by Gene Buck, its president, is the assignee of the public performance rights in the musical composition “Sleepy Time Gal.”
The defendant, Sue E. Lester, is the manager and officer of the Rialto Theatre Corporation, which operates a picture theatre in the city of Columbia, South Carolina, under the name of Rialto Theatre. On May 6th, 1927, while performances were being given in such theatre the musical composition “Sleepy Time Gal” was played on a piano player from a perforated roll for the enjoyment of the patrons.
The defendants claim that no notice of copyright appeared on the perforated roll which was being used, and that the defendants had no notice and did not know that the said piece was copyrighted. . .
I do not think this a sufficient defense under the Copyright Act (17 USCA).
It is, therefore, ordered, adjudged and decreed: That the defendants, their officers, agents, servants, and all other persons acting under the direction, control, permission or license of the defendant, be and they hereby are perpetually enjoined and restrained from publicly performing for profit said musical composition entitled “Sleepy Time Gal,” and from causing or permitting the said composition to be publicly performed for profit, in said theatre or any other place, owned, controlled, or conducted by the defendants, and from aiding or abetting the public performance of said composition in any such place or otherwise; and it is further ordered, adjudged and decreed: That the plaintiffs recover of the defendants the sum of two hundred and fifty ($250.00) dollars as damages and the further sum of fifty ($50.00) dollars as an attorney’s fee' and the costs as taxed.